This doesn't make sense. By not allowing business to screw up and destroy something that's been there for thousands of years, becomes an offset excuse for business to continue to pollute somewhere else. Who thought of this??? Stupid!

Check out the standards for validation/verification and read into the specifics of this project. It may make more sense after that.

While the system can always be improved, it's hard to say that a 99-year conservation covenant on one of the region's most productive waterfowl habitats is "stupid."