Dallas Area Gets Economic, Environmental Benefits from Green Cement

  • Email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Read Comments

DALLAS, Texas -- Who would have guessed that a simple change of phrase could have such a big impact? By switching tactics from attacking "toxic cement" to promoting "green cement," the Dallas area has been an example of the benefits of new techniques for making cement.

Jim Schermbeck, an environmental advocate with Downwinders at Risk, credits the new wording with making a big difference. Speaking to Megan Feldman for an article in the Dallas Observer, Schermbeck is quoted as saying "We took a negative -- the phrase 'toxic cement' -- and turned it over on its side to get 'green cement,' a way to positively sell this message." He adds that "'An Inconvenient Truth' [former Vice President Al Gore's global-warming documentary] had just come out; everything green was suddenly faddish. It was good timing."

Two years ago, when this all began happening, the North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee passed a recommendation that urged local city councils to promote "green cement" with financial incentives for for construction projects. Now a handful of cities -- Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington and Plano -- as well as the Dallas County school district have made green cement a requirement for municipal projects.

The resolutions have resulted in a switch from more-polluting wet kilns to cleaner dry kilns, since usually only dry kilns can meet the emissions cutoff for the preferential purchasing program. And Feldman quotes Brian Boerner, Fort Worth's environmental management director, as saying that municipal projects that switched to green cement suffered from no lack of supply and cost increases of only 1.05 percent.

In a recent article on GreenerDesign.com, Sarah Fister Gale looks at a couple of companies that are reversing the cycle of cement and CO2: Calera and Carbon Sciences are both using carbon dioxide as a building block for creating cement or other useful building materials.

The full article from the Dallas Observer is online at DallasObserver.com.

Comments

So what really makes "green cement" more sustainable?

Besides the change from wet to dry kilns (which undoubtably still use a lot of energy), in what way is this cement better for the environment? It sounds like they merely rephrased the name and not much was actually changed. If someone could help me figure this out I'd appreciate it. Right now it seems like it's a blatant case of greenwashing...

Greeening America's Marketing Machine

How about buying electricity from a green coal plant instead of the dirty kind? Or green gasoline? How about that green dioxin: far better than the ordinary stuff.

I think I'll stick with green beer on St. Patty's day.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human? Thanks for helping us block auto-spammers.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
 

Integrated Facilities Management Sponsor

Design Sponsor

Certification Sponsor

Innovation Sponsor

Work Environment Sponsor

Environmental Services Sponsor

Energy Management Sponsor

See GreenerBuildings.com

Technology Sponsor

See GreenerComputing.com

Public Relations Sponsor